Super Cities №24 — Ban Technology to Become Smarter

Brendan Hart

Be a Smarter Human

In a series of experiments at Princeton University and the University of California, Los Angeles, students were randomly assigned either laptops or pen and paper for note-taking at a lecture. Those who had used laptops had substantially worse understanding of the lecture, as measured by a standardized test, than those who did not.

If you’ve ever taught a class — or tried to have a spontaneous human moment with someone eyes-deep on their phone — you know that it is nearly impossible to break the Facebook-Twitter-Instagram time and focus monopoly.

There’s always one more thing to look at, one more thing to like, one more thing to share with your friends. This behavior is counter-productive.

According to these studies, at least in the classroom, we learn better without technology. This conclusion strikes me as correct, but I would suggest it is accurate in the corporate environment too.

As I see it, the technology-no technology decision is about aligning rewards.

We’re rewarded, in real time, on social sites — but, importantly, rewarded, over time, for real learning. As a result, we readily justify those extra minutes on Instagram, classroom or not, with the aspirationally implicit goal of catching up on missed learning at some later point. I don’t think it works that way.

I haven’t been on FB in years. It is liberating, mentally and emotionally, and keeps me grounded in the here-and-now reality of life. This is a reward that no number of comments can match.

You've successfully subscribed to Super Cities
Welcome back! You've successfully signed in.
Great! You've successfully signed up.
Success! Your account is fully activated, you now have access to all content.